JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 11, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Alejandro Alvarez Bedoya

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Inaplicación para el caso cuando el demandado es el Consejo Superior o Seccional de la Judicatura
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente contentivo de la tutela propuesta por el ciudadano de la referencia contra la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Córdoba y la Secretaría Judicial de la misma Corporación, a la Sala Laboral de Tribunal Superior de Montería, lo anterior, por ser la autoridad que conoció a prevención de la tutela interpuesta por el accionante, quien debe adoptar en primera instancia la decisión que corresponda y garantizar el derecho a la doble instancia, si el actor llegare a hacer uso del mismo.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela propuesta por el ciudadano Alejandro Alvarez Bedoya contra la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cordoba y al Secretaria Judicial de la misma Corporacion, a la Sala Laboral de Tribunal Superior de Monteria.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.